Tuesday 15 January 2013

50 Shades of WTF…Yes, I Read It. And I am Not Ashamed.


While I was reading 50 Shades of Grey, I kept a running list in my head of things people say in the book that nobody--outside of people in 1950's sitcoms--says in real life. Phrases like Oh my, for pity's sake, mighty fine, for heaven's sake, crap / double crap / triple crap, and, my personal favorite, down there (in reference to the lady bits).

Oh my was a particularly popular one—this was the heroine’s go-to phrase, which she dropped more often than most people say like. “He’s putting his hand down my panties! Oh my!” “He just suggested I sign a contract saying he can debase me! Oh my!” “I’m a complete and utter waste of space! Oh my!

50 Shades, for those of you who haven’t read it, is the story of a young woman, Ana, who meets and falls in love with a 27-year-old gajillionaire named Christian Grey. They meet cute—Ana actually trips and does a face plant into his office—and they strike up a romance. Problem is—she’s a virgin and wants a regular boyfriend. (I think.) He’s a Dominant looking for a sub. This is an approximation of her face when he shows her his "red room of pain":



The writing is my first quibble. These people were supposed to be early-to-mid-twenties adults who live in Portland, Oregon in the present time, but they talked like June Cleaver. Any time the author tried to break out of that, it came out as painfully out-of-place and flat. The writing was absolutely cringe-worthy.

Then there was the “inner goddess.” Ana’s inner goddess was apparently this whole other person who followed her around, did tap dances when Ana was happy, and hid under furniture when she wasn’t. Or was that the subconscious? The subconscious followed her around too. In one scene, the inner goddess was “panting” while the subconscious was under the couch. For a girl with absolutely no sexual drive whatsoever before she meets Christian, Ana’s id is one confusing, crowded place.

But even so, I get why people like 50 Shades of Grey. I do.

It repeats all the required romance novel tropes—and takes them to the nth level. For instance. We have the hunky, fabulously wealthy hero. How Christian became this rich and successful in his 20’s, we have no idea. We also don’t know what his business does. He could be a blood diamond magnate, for all we know. But we do know he donates to a lot of charities. So yay.

And then we have the naive, sexually inexperienced heroine. Ana is a college senior whose hobbies include classic British lit, flushing, and lip-chewing. And her innocence strains credulity. Let’s see…she’s beautiful, she’s not from a conservative religious background, she doesn’t have a history of sexual abuse…but she’s never had sex, never masturbated—apparently never seen a penis. What, does this girl not have the Internet? Doesn’t she get curious??

And yet she immediately becomes some kind of multiple-orgasm-having, deep-throat-giving sex queen the minute she gets naked with Christian. Ohh-kay.

The sex scenes were probably the best writing in the book, in my opinion. …Except where he pulls her TAMPON out of her VAGINA in one of them.



Anyway. I think what really makes this book work—what keeps readers coming back—is the emotional manipulation. Christian—outwardly strong, tough, and controlling; inwardly a little wounded bird with a history of sex abuse—never sleeps over with a  woman. Never lets a woman touch him during sex. Never wants more than a sexual relationship.

Except he wants those things with Ana.

That’s the draw of the bad boy. It’s why the nice guy isn’t that compelling—because he’s nice to everyone. The bad boy, however, treats most women like tissue paper. Except you. You special, special sparkly unicorn, you.



And I can pick on the excruciating writing in this book all day. That’s mostly what I spent my time doing in the Twitter posts. But I actually have a deeper problem with the book—despite what works.

People fall for 50 Shades for the same reason they fell for the Twilight books—which 50 Shades started its life as fanfic for. In Twilight, you have the tension between a young, innocent woman falling for a courtly, elegant man who isn’t sure if he wants to date her or kill her. In 50 Shades, you have that same tension—between a young, innocent heroine and a courtly, elegant man who isn’t sure if he wants to date her or tie her to a stake and beat her black and blue. Exact same tension.

Except 50 Shades takes everything that’s dysfunctional about the relationship in Twilight and amplifies it. Ana is more useless and weak than Bella Swan. And Christian is more abusive, controlling, and dangerous than Edward. Way more.

A lot of people point out the contract Christian wants Ana to sign as a symbol of how dysfunctional their relationship was. But to me, that seemed like the only healthy thing about it.

The thing is, every relationship is a power struggle.

Wouldn’t even non-kinky relationships benefit from stating our needs up front, explaining exactly what we need—both in and out of the bedroom—and negotiating our soft and hard limits? Those might have to do with sex—or with divvying up chores. Whatever.

My point is that, even though I have no personal experience in this area, I don't think consenting Dom/sub relationships in and of themselves are necessarily dysfunctional. But this one was.

The way Christian continually disrespected Ana’s boundaries made me uncomfortable. And the way his Dom tendencies were explained by his disturbed background—as a sub for an older woman and earlier because his mom was “a crack whore”—made it seem like the Dom/sub aspect itself was unhealthy. Like attraction to this lifestyle needed some kind of dramatically terrible background to explain it. Which I imagine would be insulting to real-life kinky people.

[SPOILER ALERT]

I haven’t read the rest of the books—although, if there are other books, I think it’s safe to assume they get back together. But I couldn’t help cheering when Ana broke up with Christian at the end. It was the only semi-smart thing she did the entire book, seeing as Christian was a controlling, abusive, manipulative dick the whole time. But as to whether this new ability to make the most obvious good decisions will last in the coming books—I’m not betting on it.

5 comments:

  1. I am so glad we assigned you to write this post. This totally made my day. Thank you for this :) Brilliance, Ms Jenny, brilliance :) (you sparkley unicorn, you)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Oh yes. I am a sparkly sparkly unicorn!

    ReplyDelete
  3. You know how I feel about unicorns (fictional). In your case, fabulous (although still fictional).

    ReplyDelete
  4. Excuse me, I seem to be crying from laughing so hard. I'm crying sparkly unicorn tears, of course.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Naturally! Are there other kinds of tears?

    ReplyDelete